Submit your breaking news stories and original articles to us by contacting us
Sorry for the lack of updates on my part over the last couple of days, I was chilling in the Keys.
I know this one is a couple days old now, but if you haven’t already read John Gruber’s opinion piece on the new Apple and Intel partnership I suggest you do.
What interests me the most about it is his opinion on why Apple did not go with AMD, which seems to be the geek choice of CPUs.
AMD’s processors may be faster than Intel’s — that’s a race that will likely continue going back and forth — but Intel, inarguably, has greater production capabilities than any other semiconductor manufacturer. Intel makes more CPUs than the rest of the industry combined. No other CPU partner can make it less likely that Apple will ever again face a CPU shortage.
It makes since because why would Apple move from the PowerPC platform if it was constantly getting a quality supply and upgrades in speed? They wouldn’t. So your only option is to move to a company that can live up to their promises — Intel.
Category: Uncategorized
2 Responses for "Gruber on Apple and Intel"
June 14th, 2005 at 12:10 pm
1I don’t think AMD has trouble keeping up their quantity, so that seems to be a BS answer. Not only are the speeds very comparable, but AMD currently has the edge in 64-bit and they are cheaper. All this will do is keep Apple’s prices high for any decent machine you try to get from them.
June 14th, 2005 at 3:51 pm
2Apple wants total security when it comes to supply issues. AMD produces nice chips…but they just aren’t big enough to guarentee they will be around for years to come.
Apple went the safe route here and it makes perfect sense to me. After all, if I had to put my customers through a change as big as this, you want to make sure there isn’t a problem in the future related to supply.
RSS feed for comments on this post
Leave a reply