Submit your breaking news stories and original articles to us by contacting us
I know this is a terrible presumption but bear with me and read the whole article first.
According to IE’s blog “IE7 relies on operating system functionality in XPSP2″.
If IE7 requires some of XPSP2’s functionalities (as Microsoft calls them) or as I like to say bugs, then this means that Longhorn will either:
a) Require these “functionalities”, therefore, be buggier than it could have been;
b) Have a re-done version of IE7, which means, an even buggier and more unsecure browser than on SP2;
Or c) (the most likely reason [that doesn’t really follow the first part of the sentence]) IE7 doesn’t require SP2’s functionalities, the only thing that is “required” is more income for Microsoft.
You may have heard a few times already that Microsoft is having trouble convincing people with older versions of their OS’es to upgrade to the latest one. Since they can’t beat them, they decide to leave people in the Neanderthal era by applying measures such as reducing support, making their newest programs compatible with the latest versions only (Office, IE7) or by even more drastic measures, having their code leaked over the Internet (ok so this last one might be exagerated).
The world is worried about Microsoft’s monopoly? I’m not, there are already plenty or alternatives, and in some cases better than Microsoft’s products. I’m worried about the way Microsoft is pulling it’s strings, this might sound corny but, Microsoft started off as Anakin and has now become a Darth Vader of the computer industry (ok it’s very corny).
What’s keeping technology from evolving? It’s not the lack of processing capability, that’s for sure, it’s the lack of enough market share of competitor OS’es to give Microsoft a run for their money and to learn how to treat their customers better, instead of devising ways of milking as much money from them as they can.
Until that day comes, Microsoft can continue strengthening their Death Star and swallow everything around them, but I for one am almost sure that in my next system, I will join the rebellion.
(No more Star Wars puns, I promise! I promise!)
Category: General
7 Responses for "Internet Explorer 7 XPSP2 only bound?"
May 30th, 2005 at 8:36 am
1I think option C is most likely ;)
May 31st, 2005 at 12:59 am
2Posts like this are pure garbage. Nothing but anti-Microsoft hate here. And all opinion without any factual evidence to back it up. Why did I even bother reading this post? Time wasted, that is for sure.
May 31st, 2005 at 4:31 am
3Yeah, seems a bit harsh to me. B) doesn’t even makes sense…
Is it unreasonable to “retire” old OSs? W2K is 5 years old now, might even be 6 by the time IE7 comes out…Gotta pull the plug sometime…
May 31st, 2005 at 5:22 am
4Those reasons are not supposed to make sense besides c), that’s the whole point of the article. Microsoft is hardly ever frank to their customers and they always try to pull some bull to get their products to sell more.
I’m not a Microsoft hater, I’m using Windows XP right now, I just don’t like to see companies, whichever they are, treating their customers like idiots.
It makes absolutely no sense for an internet browser to only work with only one version of the same operative system branch, if IE7 is supposed to have major security updates then the first one should be to un-tie it from the OS!
May 31st, 2005 at 8:42 am
5I thought it had been known for long that IE7 would only work on XP and later…
May 31st, 2005 at 9:46 am
6“I just don’t like to see companies, whichever they are, treating their customers like idiots.”
Well, most of us(the public) are idiots. With no other viable alternative to Microsoft software, we just gotta take what our master feeds us.
July 11th, 2005 at 5:54 pm
7I liked very much to visit your Site. For more info read: http://found-money-investment.info/online-investing-services.html I understand these points, friends
RSS feed for comments on this post
Leave a reply