Submit your breaking news stories and original articles to us by contacting us
Canadians usually have to pay a blank media levy on all blank writable media, and hard drives in mp3 players. This levy (small extra charge) goes to the recording industry to pay them to allow us to make personal copies of music from friends or whomever. (I.E. legally download mp3’s from the net.)
The Canadian Supreme Court have decided that they won’t hear a case involving extra fees for iPods and other MP3 players, thus rekindling the debate over the legality of file swapping.
“The country’s trade association for record labels quickly welcomed the Supreme Court’s action as a sign that unauthorized file swapping was once again viewed as unambiguously illegal.”
Now I know most of the readers of FG probably are from the USA, and thus this does not matter to you, but here in Canada, our iPods and everything are a little more expensive due to this extra charge we have to pay. Without the charge we lose the right to download music, and thus our version of the RIAA wins.
Another sad day, as the business world tries to stop us from enjoying music. I really believed that the US would see the error of their ways, and create a media levy system like Canada, and that our way would be the model for the world, rather than the way that the US does it with lawsuits.
Category: News
7 Responses for "No iPod tax for Canada"
July 29th, 2005 at 8:51 am
1Thats great for you guys up north. It seems today that we are taxed to death as it is anyway. Consumer groups would have a field day with the recording industry trying to tax us here in the United States for mp3, or ipods.
By the way the comments in the post entitle: Microsoft “Genuine Advantage” cracked in 24h is not working for me for some reason. Maybe its me or maybe its not. (Think agent smith in the matrix when reading the last sentence)
August 1st, 2005 at 9:22 pm
2I like the idea and the method the Canadians are using for their digital music. One question … Just how much extra do you pay? Let say it’s about 20 bucks, do you know how fast I could burn through that on itunes?
I think they should do the same for PC’s. I have a $700 system with $30k in software on it that I didn’t pay a dime for. I would gladly have paid an extra $100 dollars or so to have all this software and not have to worry about how legal it is. Just a thought.
August 2nd, 2005 at 1:12 pm
3I continue to be perplexed by the supposition that, as you put it, “this levy goes to the recording industry to pay them to allow us to make personal copies of music from friends or whomever.”
I’m a semi-professional Canadian musician regularly receiving royalty cheques from SOCAN (Canada’s ASCAP) for my performances and airplay, but I have yet to see any of this supposed pay from the blank media tax, although I do have to pay into it everytime I buy a spool of CDs.
August 2nd, 2005 at 1:20 pm
4Well I guess it does not go directly to the artist…I think the money goes to the bigger companies (like BMG and whatnot).
November 16th, 2005 at 9:36 pm
5I’ve managed to save up roughly $75672 in my bank account, but I’m not sure if I should buy a house or not. Do you think the market is stable or do you think that home prices will decrease by a lot?
January 12th, 2006 at 3:41 pm
6I can’t believe it, my co-worker just bought a car for $80535. Isn’t that crazy!
January 12th, 2006 at 8:55 pm
7I can’t believe it, my co-worker just bought a car for $80535. Isn’t that crazy!
RSS feed for comments on this post
Leave a reply